Comment by inimino
4 years ago
You don't need to read it, you just need to be able to read it.
Just because there are risks doesn't mean the risks are meaningfully comparable.
4 years ago
You don't need to read it, you just need to be able to read it.
Just because there are risks doesn't mean the risks are meaningfully comparable.
Ken Thompson won a Turing Award for showing how that isn’t the case: http://users.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-thom...
May I direct your attention to https://reproducible-builds.org/
That what isn't the case? Pointing out additional threat vectors doesn't in any way contradict my point.