Comment by jeffreyrogers
5 years ago
I'm sure there are examples, but in common use it is understood to be plural and has been used that way in all writing for a long time.
5 years ago
I'm sure there are examples, but in common use it is understood to be plural and has been used that way in all writing for a long time.
That is not correct
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they#Usage
> They with a singular antecedent goes back to the Middle English of the 14th century... and has remained in common use for centuries...
> in common use it is understood to be plural
What I said is correct. Prior to about 4-5 years ago you did not find people using they in the singular, hence "in common use".
> I’m sure there are examples, but in common use it is understood to be plural and has been used that way in all writing for a long time.
It is grammatically plural, but it has been accepted for semantically singular use since long before the Victorian effort to impose Latin-inspired rules on English usage which failed to eradicate it despite intense effort. (Victorian prescriptivism did have some good effects — regularized spelling FTW — but trying to eradicate clear and useful usages like singular “they” was one of its less-well-considered, but fortunately also less-successful, efforts.)
> in common use it is understood to be plural
Nothing in what you wrote contradicts what I stated. The man on the street thinks they is plural, and nearly all writing treats it that way. Historical examples excepted.