← Back to context Comment by zserge 5 years ago Some time ago I've made a humble decoding of this wonderful code snippet: https://zserge.com/posts/j/ 4 comments zserge Reply dang 5 years ago Discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22831931 daneelsan 5 years ago Thanks for this! daneelsan 5 years ago I don't get why the 5 in '5 + tr(...)'. t+r+d[3] is 5, I guess? The verb function should return an I and not an A. e->tokens in the wd function. bear8642 5 years ago Indeed - was confused what elements of struct were on line 2.Thanks for explaining
daneelsan 5 years ago Thanks for this! daneelsan 5 years ago I don't get why the 5 in '5 + tr(...)'. t+r+d[3] is 5, I guess? The verb function should return an I and not an A. e->tokens in the wd function. bear8642 5 years ago Indeed - was confused what elements of struct were on line 2.Thanks for explaining
daneelsan 5 years ago I don't get why the 5 in '5 + tr(...)'. t+r+d[3] is 5, I guess? The verb function should return an I and not an A. e->tokens in the wd function.
bear8642 5 years ago Indeed - was confused what elements of struct were on line 2.Thanks for explaining
Discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22831931
Thanks for this!
I don't get why the 5 in '5 + tr(...)'. t+r+d[3] is 5, I guess? The verb function should return an I and not an A. e->tokens in the wd function.
Indeed - was confused what elements of struct were on line 2.
Thanks for explaining