← Back to context Comment by DavidAdams 4 years ago Yeah, my first thought after reading that anecdote was that the new COO should have been fired. 2 comments DavidAdams Reply gamacodre 4 years ago And the CTO too, for caving to that argument. quelsolaar 4 years ago A team that needs 6 months to get their code running on a computer on-premise, might also be replaceable. Maybe the lesson is that that team that produces source code without value.
gamacodre 4 years ago And the CTO too, for caving to that argument. quelsolaar 4 years ago A team that needs 6 months to get their code running on a computer on-premise, might also be replaceable. Maybe the lesson is that that team that produces source code without value.
quelsolaar 4 years ago A team that needs 6 months to get their code running on a computer on-premise, might also be replaceable. Maybe the lesson is that that team that produces source code without value.
And the CTO too, for caving to that argument.
A team that needs 6 months to get their code running on a computer on-premise, might also be replaceable. Maybe the lesson is that that team that produces source code without value.