Comment by lou1306
4 years ago
But still, this kind of research puts undue pressure on the kernel maintainers who have to review patches that were not submitted in good faith (where "good faith" = the author of the patch were trying to improve the kernel)
I think that was kind of the point of the research: submitting broken patches to the kernel represents a feasible attack surface which is difficult to mitigate, precisely because kernel maintainers already have such a hard job.
So what's the null hypothesis here? Human maintainers are infallible? Why this even need to be researched?