Comment by liamwire
4 years ago
Unfortunately “no” doesn’t constitute a rebuttal, and the responding commenter makes many valid points.
It is self-evident that this study tangibly involved people in the scope, those people did not provide consent prior, and now openly state their grievances. It is nothing short of arguing in bad faith to claim otherwise.
What you said has nothing to do with my point: This study is not a human research.
At this point you’re doing nothing more than reiterating falsehoods, and it appears you’ve nothing constructive to add.