← Back to context

Comment by throwaway_kufu

5 years ago

> "Was it really that hard a leap?" - yes it was. That it seems otherwise now is pure hindsight fallacy.

Not diminishing building an $xx billion dollar unicorn, but I think the poster has a point about couch surfing.

Couch surfing really was one of those beloved and deeply embraced communities that also had that early underground internet feel to it. I don’t think it’s fair to say taking couchsurfer.com and the concept more generally and commercializing backed by vc money is hindsight fallacy, even if pg didn’t like the idea when YC funded Airbnb.

Now if the concept and strong organic community it inspired didn’t previously exist then I’m totally on board with your sentiment. But maybe I’m wrong too and Airbnb bears no relation or resemblance to couch surfing before it.

Edit: read the email thread you linked too, in it also confirms within the VC debate the old guys didn’t get it while the young guys did. This may be why the poster felt it was relevant to use the adjective “rich”, older or more established VCs were less likely to be or know couchsurfers. The other thing the vc noted were the Airbnb customers were already listing on multiple marketplaces.

The connection to Couchsurfing was obvious at the time. But taking that seriously as a venture investment was not. That is the hindsight fallacy part. Calling that "mythology" is inaccurate, as that email thread plainly shows.