← Back to context

Comment by dragonwriter

4 years ago

> This article reads like she did not say no as much as she did not say yes

Yeah, if I beat someone up and they didn’t explicitly agree or explicitly ask me not to pummel them, no one is going to hem and haw about whether or not it was battery or whether it wasn’t because of secret unexpressed consent.

But no, when the issue is battery-that-involves-sexual-penetration, *which legally had the same basic “without consent” factor (except that there tend to be more factors which explicitly negate or make the alleged victim legally incapable of consent), suddenly lots of people have a radically different view.

Beating someone up and having sex with them are two very distinct things. And saying sex is "battery that involves sexual penetration" is no helping either.

Just painting this as a simplistic "powerful male predator abuses helpless little female" does not help to move society forward one bit.