← Back to context Comment by bosswipe 5 years ago That has three constants. 4 comments bosswipe Reply mkoryak 5 years ago is this better?const charA = (![]+[])[+!+[]]; mkehrt 5 years ago I cannot even parse this. What is going on here? pdpi 5 years ago [] is still a constant. mkoryak 5 years ago True, but we can both agree that this is a better constant than "a". Much better job security in that code.. unless you get fired for writing it, that is
mkoryak 5 years ago is this better?const charA = (![]+[])[+!+[]]; mkehrt 5 years ago I cannot even parse this. What is going on here? pdpi 5 years ago [] is still a constant. mkoryak 5 years ago True, but we can both agree that this is a better constant than "a". Much better job security in that code.. unless you get fired for writing it, that is
pdpi 5 years ago [] is still a constant. mkoryak 5 years ago True, but we can both agree that this is a better constant than "a". Much better job security in that code.. unless you get fired for writing it, that is
mkoryak 5 years ago True, but we can both agree that this is a better constant than "a". Much better job security in that code.. unless you get fired for writing it, that is
is this better?
const charA = (![]+[])[+!+[]];
I cannot even parse this. What is going on here?
[] is still a constant.
True, but we can both agree that this is a better constant than "a". Much better job security in that code.. unless you get fired for writing it, that is