Comment by orliesaurus
5 years ago
What about option 3) here [1] - this email was initiated by Replit's CEO - so publishing the original email is...bad? [1] https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/3980/is-it-legal-to-...
5 years ago
What about option 3) here [1] - this email was initiated by Replit's CEO - so publishing the original email is...bad? [1] https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/3980/is-it-legal-to-...
What is option 3? Nobody numbered anything. If you're talking about copyright, this is obviously fair use.
The comment you are answering to refers to option 3 in the link that they post. It refers to the first answer to the question in that link, the relevant text is:
> 3. Offensive to a Reasonable Person: Publication of the private facts in question must be offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities.
The question is about whether it is illegal to publish a private email.
Thanks for doing a better job than me at clarifying my post, I appreciate it!