Comment by shkkmo
5 years ago
The statment is only obvious to you. When you were asked why you think it is obvious, you just sort of wave your hands without any specifics and say "it's obvious" without providing any basis for what laws this person is "obviously" at risk of running afoul of. This doesn't add anything to the discussion.
You don't have to quote specific lines regulations, but you do need to do something to back your assertions besides just repeating "it's obvious" over and over.
> When you were asked why you think it is obvious
Do you really not see how there would be at least some risk, in cloning a former employer's company, with a similar product, that looks the same as it?
You don't see at all, how that could potentially, could at least have some risk, of running afoul of IP laws, or copyright, or any number of things?
Do you admit that there is any risk at all of this?