← Back to context

Comment by 0xy

4 years ago

A reasonable person would call it a normal picture if they encountered it in isolation. Like I said, content which is not even borderline are included.

By both a legal and moralistic standard they're not CSAM. Not even nearly.

Of course, this is a minority of the content in the database. But even 1 such image is gross neglect of stated purpose in my book.

But are these photos that are combined in a row with other CP, and thus indicative that if you have this photo, it’s from a CP collection?

Why would I have any content in my phone that would be in that database?

  • Imagine things like:

    - A kitchen with nobody in frame.

    - A couch with nobody in frame.

    - Outdoor scenery with nobody in frame.

    - A bathroom with nobody in frame.

    Is it hard to believe you wouldn't download something like this without knowing where it came from?

    I'm not talking about borderline stuff. I'm talking about content that has not even a hint of pornography or illegality.

    • But why am I downloading such things to begin with? Not only do these sound like very boring photos, given their providence I don’t understand this realistic pathway to get onto my phone.

  • It's easy to imagine a collection with pictures from numerous sources. Including pictures of adults.