Comment by yyyk

Upvoted.

That said, I do feel you miss the genius of the iDog proposal. As far as I understand, an officer might sometimes be able to use his dog's nose if it happens during a procedure (which might include the dog searching if there's a warrant), but he can't create the circumstances deliberately. 'I was doing something proper and then the dog started jumping' might be admissible, but if an officer started walking the dog around hoping to catch people opinion might be different.

We suggest regularly scanning every household in the nation in a deliberate process. I was just proofreading five different papers proving the system is perfect if we can trust the dogs (of course we can, only monsters and terrorists don't trust dogs).