← Back to context

Comment by scelerat

14 years ago

The notion that BART areas are not public and subject to the First Amendment ("right to peaceably assemble...") is absurd on its face and in detail.

Of course it's public space. That's where the public is!

And, BART is financed by public money and operated by an agency that reports directly to regional government.

What qualifies as an expressive activity? Saying "I love my friends!" is an expressive activity, and so is saying "BART police shouldn't shoot people who don't deserve to be shot!"

You should definitely be able to "assemble" peaceably and say whatever you want to say.

BART should be within its rights to remove people who actively disrupt the service by blocking platforms or cars or ticket booths, but going beyond that (i.e. removing someone from a train because they were critical of BART or its policies) is too far. If that's what this release is indeed implying...

There is no "the public". There are people with rights going places, which may be publicly or privately owned.