← Back to context

Comment by seba_dos1

4 years ago

What is that "but does advocate for transparency" even supposed to mean? EFF is not a government, it doesn't have to be transparent at all.

It's a 501c charity, so it does have to be somewhat transparent in exchange for its protected tax status.

What is hard to understand here, really? Nobody said anything about EFF having to be transparent.

  • That text in parenthesis is completely irrelevant to the rest of the sentence and feels cheap. It's clearly trying to convey "they advocate for transparency but aren't even transparent themselves", which is missing the point. I read it as a form of manipulation to instill particular feeling towards EFF in the reader.