Comment by 1023bytes
4 years ago
Well that's very cheap considering people spend millions of dollars on hashes of pictures of randomly generated monkeys
4 years ago
Well that's very cheap considering people spend millions of dollars on hashes of pictures of randomly generated monkeys
In a number of high-value cases, no one spent any money at all, just transaction fees; they traded to themselves to give the appearance of a higher price.
Wait, are you talking about NFTs still or auction of physical goods?
I assume your comment is tongue in cheek since this practice happens in both industries. Perhaps you can help me though, I've been trying to remember the term used for this for weeks. I seem to recall it being called something like "washing the pipe" or something like that....?
1 reply →
Probably referring to this: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/crypto-punk-500-million-sa...
In an even larger number of high-value cases, they traded to themselves to transfer ill-gotten crypto from "anonymous bidder" wallets to their "real" wallets.
I thought a lot about this comment. I deeply would want that Apple-1 in a way, massive piece of Apple history. But then I think about owning it - what a pain. It needs to be in an air conditioned room, bugs nibble at it, dust gathers, where do I put it in my house anyway? It's so cool in my mind but the glory of having it seems less so.
However, with an NFT, there's no maintenance cost, it's always the same, it's pristine. I can do whatever I want with it, shrink it for socks, grow it to put on a blimp, make cakes, whatever.
For the first time I can see why people spend millions of dollars on hashes of pictures of randomly generated monkeys.
You can still make socks, blimps, or cakes with any sort of monkey image you want... or even non-monkey images. The technology is out there.
I’ll just pirate your monkey picture.
Haha yes of course, please do! The more the merrier, more of my monkey for everyone! There's always a record on the blockchain that it's indeed mine - or not if I so choose!
1 reply →
You right-clicker! /s
I wish I had a hash of a 50 year old computer
Here you go: b4a457fa7a566ca23fb214b986ff19234234a0654dc786f348377990b53585abb7dc1fa91672ab15de0d87deb66133f5657f85a2662bd1f95de3743933d49982. It's the SHA512 hash of the full-size version header image of an Apple I from Wikipedia.
Thanks man, I'll do some research for the part of making millions with it
Please take this down; I own it.
4 replies →
Wow. So something that’s essentially a piece of junk today has a valid absurdly high price just because there are absurdly high priced random digital thingies?
Well an NFT has way more utility than this thing. It makes you part of an online community. Naturally it has a different value.
"...part of a community". Man, I didn't know Amway[0] had pivoted to NFTs. Speaking of business, did you know that as an Amway representative, you can become part of a community of small business owners! I mean, NFT owners!
[0]https://www.amway.com
Owning and tinkering with retro computers makes you part of the retro computing fan community, which exists online and offline.
*which exists.
3 replies →
I've been told this by various MLM salesmen multiple times. Seems NFT "investors" aren't hiding it anymore.
I could join a community of rich people throwing paper money onto fires too. But I wouldn't want to, therefore no value.
https://www.scotsman.com/whats-on/arts-and-entertainment/why...
Not easy...
You're correct that buying a BAYC nft does make you a member of a very active community. It's very much a club membership.
But owning a prime piece of vintage computing history gets you into a community too. And owning one is as much as status play as BAYC is.
This has more utility because, assuming it works, it's a general purpose computer. You might even be able to mine crypto with it.
You can join online communities for free, but then again there's not much value in joining online communities.
I think you just hit on something there, though.
There isn't an easy way to flex your status online, unless you're a celebrity, or put in the work to become an influencer.
For people with money, there isn't a simple way to come to places like HN and just be important because you have money. There isn't a way to show people how wealthy and powerful you are without contributing.
But NFT's allow you to show people how much disposable income you have, and therefore how much better you are than the unwashed masses, without needing to really do anything of substance.
Or maybe that's just my own personal bias and confusion about NFT's in general showing?
4 replies →
Cite?
While "crypto" is the same length as "money" it means "cryptocurrency" which is way longer than "cash". This link explains it: https://youtu.be/kc4Ob6LAv8Y