← Back to context Comment by floatingatoll 4 years ago That order is not guaranteed consistent across installations, however. 9 comments floatingatoll Reply marginalia_nu 4 years ago I wonder if code to this effect has ever been written before for (int i = 1; i < INT_MAX; i++) { if (dirExists("C:\\PROGRA~%d\\ProgramName", i)) { gmfawcett 4 years ago And that, children, is when marginalia_nu unlocked the seventh circle of the inferno. Tomorrow we'll read the story of how our new demon overlords forced us all back to Windows 3.1. jagged-chisel 4 years ago Win 3.1? on DOS 6.22? Actually, this sounds like heaven. Just don't put it on the public 'tubes. 1 reply → marginalia_nu 4 years ago Got to tweak HIMEM.SYS before the slumbering one can be awakened. 1 reply → floatingatoll 4 years ago For whatever it’s worth, this is a terrible idea, for so many different reasons:https://web.archive.org/web/20100107184218/http://blogs.msdn...And so, yes, I’m certain someone must have done it, because it’s clearly bad idea jeans and so Murphy’s Law says it must exist. benibela 4 years ago Can that work for i > 9 ? floatingatoll 4 years ago If you mkdir PROGRA~10, yes!
marginalia_nu 4 years ago I wonder if code to this effect has ever been written before for (int i = 1; i < INT_MAX; i++) { if (dirExists("C:\\PROGRA~%d\\ProgramName", i)) { gmfawcett 4 years ago And that, children, is when marginalia_nu unlocked the seventh circle of the inferno. Tomorrow we'll read the story of how our new demon overlords forced us all back to Windows 3.1. jagged-chisel 4 years ago Win 3.1? on DOS 6.22? Actually, this sounds like heaven. Just don't put it on the public 'tubes. 1 reply → marginalia_nu 4 years ago Got to tweak HIMEM.SYS before the slumbering one can be awakened. 1 reply → floatingatoll 4 years ago For whatever it’s worth, this is a terrible idea, for so many different reasons:https://web.archive.org/web/20100107184218/http://blogs.msdn...And so, yes, I’m certain someone must have done it, because it’s clearly bad idea jeans and so Murphy’s Law says it must exist. benibela 4 years ago Can that work for i > 9 ? floatingatoll 4 years ago If you mkdir PROGRA~10, yes!
gmfawcett 4 years ago And that, children, is when marginalia_nu unlocked the seventh circle of the inferno. Tomorrow we'll read the story of how our new demon overlords forced us all back to Windows 3.1. jagged-chisel 4 years ago Win 3.1? on DOS 6.22? Actually, this sounds like heaven. Just don't put it on the public 'tubes. 1 reply → marginalia_nu 4 years ago Got to tweak HIMEM.SYS before the slumbering one can be awakened. 1 reply →
jagged-chisel 4 years ago Win 3.1? on DOS 6.22? Actually, this sounds like heaven. Just don't put it on the public 'tubes. 1 reply →
marginalia_nu 4 years ago Got to tweak HIMEM.SYS before the slumbering one can be awakened. 1 reply →
floatingatoll 4 years ago For whatever it’s worth, this is a terrible idea, for so many different reasons:https://web.archive.org/web/20100107184218/http://blogs.msdn...And so, yes, I’m certain someone must have done it, because it’s clearly bad idea jeans and so Murphy’s Law says it must exist.
benibela 4 years ago Can that work for i > 9 ? floatingatoll 4 years ago If you mkdir PROGRA~10, yes!
I wonder if code to this effect has ever been written before
And that, children, is when marginalia_nu unlocked the seventh circle of the inferno. Tomorrow we'll read the story of how our new demon overlords forced us all back to Windows 3.1.
Win 3.1? on DOS 6.22? Actually, this sounds like heaven. Just don't put it on the public 'tubes.
1 reply →
Got to tweak HIMEM.SYS before the slumbering one can be awakened.
1 reply →
For whatever it’s worth, this is a terrible idea, for so many different reasons:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100107184218/http://blogs.msdn...
And so, yes, I’m certain someone must have done it, because it’s clearly bad idea jeans and so Murphy’s Law says it must exist.
Can that work for i > 9 ?
If you mkdir PROGRA~10, yes!