← Back to context Comment by philjohn 3 years ago Wireguard needs an endpoint 2 comments philjohn Reply anderspitman 3 years ago If I understand GP correctly, the goal is to SSH into an RPi on a home network. Since they mention DDNS, it's implied that they're connecting directly to their home router. What I'm saying is why not port forward directly to the RPi? 72deluxe 3 years ago Yes you are right. If just connecting to the Pi, port forwarding is fine (and I use this).When adding more devices at home (IP cameras etc.) and not connecting just to the Pi then the Wireguard VPN comes in.
anderspitman 3 years ago If I understand GP correctly, the goal is to SSH into an RPi on a home network. Since they mention DDNS, it's implied that they're connecting directly to their home router. What I'm saying is why not port forward directly to the RPi? 72deluxe 3 years ago Yes you are right. If just connecting to the Pi, port forwarding is fine (and I use this).When adding more devices at home (IP cameras etc.) and not connecting just to the Pi then the Wireguard VPN comes in.
72deluxe 3 years ago Yes you are right. If just connecting to the Pi, port forwarding is fine (and I use this).When adding more devices at home (IP cameras etc.) and not connecting just to the Pi then the Wireguard VPN comes in.
If I understand GP correctly, the goal is to SSH into an RPi on a home network. Since they mention DDNS, it's implied that they're connecting directly to their home router. What I'm saying is why not port forward directly to the RPi?
Yes you are right. If just connecting to the Pi, port forwarding is fine (and I use this).
When adding more devices at home (IP cameras etc.) and not connecting just to the Pi then the Wireguard VPN comes in.