Comment by throwaway6734
5 years ago
>By definition a civilian is not fighting.
They might not be bearing arms, but they are contributing to the russian economy.
Without the presence of nuclear weapons, NATO forces would be bombing moscow right now, causing significantly more economic disruption and disruption to civilians.
It's war.
>They might not be bearing arms, but they are contributing to the russian economy.
I didn't realize we were in a total war. What's next? Drone strikes so the "economy" shrinks?
NATO members can not risk drone striking Russian territory due to the risk of a nuclear war.
Without nukes Moscow would be under heavy bombing right now
> They might not be bearing arms, but they are contributing to the russian economy.
First, that's a very weak justification to attack civilians. Second, how does stopping them from paying for a non-local service help?
> Without the presence of nuclear weapons, NATO forces would be bombing moscow right now, causing significantly more economic disruption and disruption to civilians.
I doubt it, there's a reason Ukraine isn't in NATO, but thank God for nuclear deterrence. I don't want WW3, some people seem to be jumping at the bit for it.
> It's war.
Not ours. I support aid, nothing else.
-- EDIT [reached post limit, replying to below] --
> It's causing a disruption and lessening the productivity of the Russian economy
No it's not, if anything now more Russians will go to domain providers based in their country, keeping the money in their economy.
> If you're Russian. It is your war.
I'm not Russian. I'm not Ukrainian. Therefore it's not my war.
It's causing a disruption and lessening the productivity of the Russian economy
>Not ours. I support aid, nothing else.
If you're Russian. It is your war.