← Back to context Comment by tptacek 4 years ago I claim that you are not, because your points don't cohere with the concept of an encyclopedia. 2 comments tptacek Reply dendriti 4 years ago A compendium of knowledge can't be a compendium of knowledge if it has too much knowledge in it? tptacek 4 years ago Again, you can't win an argument by pulling out a dictionary. Wikipedia is clear about what its goals are.
dendriti 4 years ago A compendium of knowledge can't be a compendium of knowledge if it has too much knowledge in it? tptacek 4 years ago Again, you can't win an argument by pulling out a dictionary. Wikipedia is clear about what its goals are.
tptacek 4 years ago Again, you can't win an argument by pulling out a dictionary. Wikipedia is clear about what its goals are.
A compendium of knowledge can't be a compendium of knowledge if it has too much knowledge in it?
Again, you can't win an argument by pulling out a dictionary. Wikipedia is clear about what its goals are.