← Back to context

Comment by thehappypm

3 years ago

I don’t think I agree. The world gets really confusing when you take costs into account. Try buying a phone charger. The $5 one might be overflowing with 5 star reviews saying how great it is for the price, but it’s just crap. Likewise the $100 one that’s amazing but some 3 star reviews for “too expensive”.

The issue is why they completely ignore costs and legacy substitution: vendor relations and content.

The true answer is often "The old version was just as good or better, don't upgrade."

But nobody gets a continual churn of review clicks and affiliate purchase cuts off of that.

Ignoring it with "price is hard" is disingenuous on the part of review sites. Notably, this was initially one of Wirecutter's key draws: presenting winners in a price-segmented manner.