Comment by Jcowell
3 years ago
> ah, the ad hominem, never a good sign for the proceeding argument.
GP never says that you’re naive, but the comment was.
3 years ago
> ah, the ad hominem, never a good sign for the proceeding argument.
GP never says that you’re naive, but the comment was.
either way (intent can also be multi-modal), it signals a triggered response and is entirely superfluous and distracting. it's worth setting that aside, even after writing it, and examining the emotional underpinnings that led to the response in the first place. we learn a lot about our own subconsciousness that way.
>, ... it signals a triggered response
This is, at best, a stretch.
I have no idea what it is you're trying to say but I did laugh that your username is clarity! :)
excellent, my diabolical plan to rule the world via dry humor is working as designed.