← Back to context Comment by adrianN 4 years ago It's a lot harder to get unbiased news if you solely rely on volunteers. 4 comments adrianN Reply abirch 4 years ago Can you imagine getting your news from a version of Richard Stallman. adrianN 4 years ago I do in fact read his RSS feed from time to time... goodpoint 4 years ago There is no such thing as "unbiased" and there is nothing wrong with biased news as long as the reader is aware of the bias. adrianN 4 years ago There is nothing wrong about biased news if there is a variety of biases available. I think for local news the risk is very high that a small group of volunteers can capture almost all reporting and push only their biases.
abirch 4 years ago Can you imagine getting your news from a version of Richard Stallman. adrianN 4 years ago I do in fact read his RSS feed from time to time...
goodpoint 4 years ago There is no such thing as "unbiased" and there is nothing wrong with biased news as long as the reader is aware of the bias. adrianN 4 years ago There is nothing wrong about biased news if there is a variety of biases available. I think for local news the risk is very high that a small group of volunteers can capture almost all reporting and push only their biases.
adrianN 4 years ago There is nothing wrong about biased news if there is a variety of biases available. I think for local news the risk is very high that a small group of volunteers can capture almost all reporting and push only their biases.
Can you imagine getting your news from a version of Richard Stallman.
I do in fact read his RSS feed from time to time...
There is no such thing as "unbiased" and there is nothing wrong with biased news as long as the reader is aware of the bias.
There is nothing wrong about biased news if there is a variety of biases available. I think for local news the risk is very high that a small group of volunteers can capture almost all reporting and push only their biases.