← Back to context

Comment by DiggyJohnson

3 years ago

You’re coming across as extremely sensitive, and yet criticizing the maintainer for a decision so negligible it seems like satire.

I'm sensitive to the tactic of insulting people for pointing out inconvenient facts, namely that this action was taken - which got my accused of "projection" i.e. I am projecting my own childishness, based on zero evidence. Saying I'm "extremely sensitive" is another way of distracting from the point.

The decision was not negligible as far as I believe, but if you'd like to have a constructive discussion of that, rather than personal putdown, please go ahead.

  • The onus is on you to demonstrate why it’s not negligible, besides demonstrating your ability to take offense more readily than most.

    Look, I’m not the person that insulted you, but I’m sorry this happened to you if it means you’ll reevaluate your perspective of this discussion.

    • Stating that you are sorry, while continuing with the "easily offended" spiel doesn't project sincerity.

      Let me be clear - I don't agree with your perspective, either on how offended you think I am or should be, (or how relevant it is to this thread outside purposeful trolling, with personal attacks) or how negligible the naming issue is. The onus is on you to substantiate these judgements.

      2 replies →