Is it? My takeaway is "oh cool, first-class types". Experimenting with this, I can write the following:
let ConfigOf : Type -> Type = \(type : Type) ->
{- What happens if you add another field here? -}
{ home : type
, privateKey : type
, publicKey : type
}
let Config : Type = ConfigOf Text
and the rest of the example still works and evaluates the same.
Also in a later example it has the expression `generate 10 Config buildUser`, which also works because of first-class types. Instead of needing generics, you just take a type as a regular parameter.
Figured, but it's a pretty goofy way to introduce it after that comment.
[EDIT] I mean, you can almost "who's on first?" this.
"OK, what type do you want this to be?"
"Type."
"Yes, what type do you want it to be?"
"Type."
"Great, ok, yes, the type, what type is Config?"
"Type."
"WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE TYPE YOU WANT CONFIG TO BE???"
"Type."
flips desk
Is it? My takeaway is "oh cool, first-class types". Experimenting with this, I can write the following:
and the rest of the example still works and evaluates the same.
Also in a later example it has the expression `generate 10 Config buildUser`, which also works because of first-class types. Instead of needing generics, you just take a type as a regular parameter.