← Back to context Comment by polskibus 3 years ago Is <script type="module" /> not sufficient for your needs? If not then what is missing? 1 comment polskibus Reply nkozyra 3 years ago Seems to be arguing for modular layout/templating, which is what virtual includes did (the cgi in the example would hypothetically output html)
nkozyra 3 years ago Seems to be arguing for modular layout/templating, which is what virtual includes did (the cgi in the example would hypothetically output html)
Seems to be arguing for modular layout/templating, which is what virtual includes did (the cgi in the example would hypothetically output html)