← Back to context Comment by woodruffw 3 years ago Why did you censor “sack”? That’s not even a foul word. 8 comments woodruffw Reply Izkata 3 years ago It's a variation of "grow some balls": https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/grow_some_balls woodruffw 3 years ago I know that. I just don’t understand why you’d censor it. This isn’t Club Penguin. meragrin_ 3 years ago I don't think it is meant as a censor, but to be illustrative. woodruffw 3 years ago Illustrative of balls? That’s a new one. bigbillheck 3 years ago If that were the case, shouldn't it have been 's@@ck'? woodruffw 3 years ago Excellent point. 2 replies →
Izkata 3 years ago It's a variation of "grow some balls": https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/grow_some_balls woodruffw 3 years ago I know that. I just don’t understand why you’d censor it. This isn’t Club Penguin.
woodruffw 3 years ago I know that. I just don’t understand why you’d censor it. This isn’t Club Penguin.
meragrin_ 3 years ago I don't think it is meant as a censor, but to be illustrative. woodruffw 3 years ago Illustrative of balls? That’s a new one. bigbillheck 3 years ago If that were the case, shouldn't it have been 's@@ck'? woodruffw 3 years ago Excellent point. 2 replies →
bigbillheck 3 years ago If that were the case, shouldn't it have been 's@@ck'? woodruffw 3 years ago Excellent point. 2 replies →
It's a variation of "grow some balls": https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/grow_some_balls
I know that. I just don’t understand why you’d censor it. This isn’t Club Penguin.
I don't think it is meant as a censor, but to be illustrative.
Illustrative of balls? That’s a new one.
If that were the case, shouldn't it have been 's@@ck'?
Excellent point.
2 replies →