Comment by wyldfire
4 years ago
It seems like any agent holding any property on anyone's behalf should be protected against unreasonable search and seizure. "Their effects"
Why would it matter where it's held?
4 years ago
It seems like any agent holding any property on anyone's behalf should be protected against unreasonable search and seizure. "Their effects"
Why would it matter where it's held?
Because: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine