← Back to context

Comment by pas

4 years ago

Well, it's really not straightforward to know what would be the outcome of such a lawsuit. Google's ToS is one thing but the main point is that random user uploading family photos is not a protected group, so Google refusing service is very much their right. The state usually cannot force otherwise.

The state should. Otherwise, what’s the point of having it.

  • unfortunately consumer protection is basically nonexistent in the US. (besides a lot of reporting requirements, that should be streamlined and automatic anyway.)

I get "How much suing is" doesn't imply winning the case, it is just a price of getting case to court.