← Back to context Comment by zaphar 4 years ago I can find no actual evidence that DDG is run by spammers. This does not strike me as credible. 3 comments zaphar Reply ncmncm 4 years ago I can find no evidence that DDG is not run by spammers. Any claim that it is not is clearly what would demand solid evidence. cmeacham98 4 years ago That's not how the burden of proof works here. ncmncm 4 years ago The extraordinary claim here is the one DDG is making. They have every incentive to lie about it. There is no obvious way to check their claim.
ncmncm 4 years ago I can find no evidence that DDG is not run by spammers. Any claim that it is not is clearly what would demand solid evidence. cmeacham98 4 years ago That's not how the burden of proof works here. ncmncm 4 years ago The extraordinary claim here is the one DDG is making. They have every incentive to lie about it. There is no obvious way to check their claim.
cmeacham98 4 years ago That's not how the burden of proof works here. ncmncm 4 years ago The extraordinary claim here is the one DDG is making. They have every incentive to lie about it. There is no obvious way to check their claim.
ncmncm 4 years ago The extraordinary claim here is the one DDG is making. They have every incentive to lie about it. There is no obvious way to check their claim.
I can find no evidence that DDG is not run by spammers. Any claim that it is not is clearly what would demand solid evidence.
That's not how the burden of proof works here.
The extraordinary claim here is the one DDG is making. They have every incentive to lie about it. There is no obvious way to check their claim.