← Back to context

Comment by FullyFunctional

4 years ago

> We have never been their hosting provider

That is simply not how it works. The bits came from Cloudflare.

That is not how it works both technically and legally. Providing a reverse proxy is not the same as hosting the content.

  • Except, you know, when they were literally hosting the “site is down“ pages that contained anti-trans jokes.

  • Technically that’s literally how it works.

    Legally? Do you have evidence to support that theory?

    • >Technically that’s literally how it works.

      No it is not. Kiwifarms backend server isn't on cloudflare's network. When the backend server sends you some bits it hands them off to cloudflare since cloudflare is the reverse proxy ddos protection. In this case cloudflare is acting as a transit provider instead of directly hosting the backend server.

      >Legally? Do you have evidence to support that theory?

      Look up safe harbor laws in relation to ISPs. They have very broad legal protection when it comes to situations like this.

      2 replies →

  • Cloudflare is a hosting service. It has R2, workers, etc.

    And a CDN is a hosting service if you push content there and don’t set it to expire.

    • In this case cloudflare isn't the host though. They have hosting services but kiwifarms only makes use of their ddos protection (which is a reverse proxy). That means they aren't the actual host.

      2 replies →

  • They are a cache, not some load balancer. To anyone visiting their site, the difference is immaterial (otherwise, why would it even matter).

    • In this case cloudflare was the ddos protection via reverse proxy. That is different from directly hosting the website. No backend servers in this case were ever hosted on clodflare's network.

      2 replies →