Comment by skissane

> They weren't attacked, Cf was attacked for employing them

That sentence is illogical. Attacking X's employer for employing X is an attack on X – it is saying that X is unworthy of being employed

> Cf has a habit of financially supporting actual far-right activists such as Westboro Church

You make it sound like they donated money to WBC. From what I understand, at one point they accepted them as a paying customer. WBC is an atrocious organisation, but a business having them as a customer isn't "financial support" – do you apply the same standard to the many other businesses who undoubtedly have WBC and/or its leaders and members among their customers? Who is their cell carrier? What supermarket do they shop at? Which airline do they fly?