Comment by clove
4 years ago
If I'm not mistaken, the threat of violence came from someone USING the KF platform, not KF itself. If you want to make equivalences, deplatforming Destiny means removing him FROM a platform, and thus the person making threats should have been banned from KF to result an an equivalence. Yet the action taken was to actually remove the entire platform.
Am I wrong here?
I'm unfamiliar with KF but if a platform can't or won't do a good enough job of moderating its content and users, then transitively the platform itself needs to be blocked.
...and who makes this decision? What's the measurement of doing a "good enough job?"
I was responding to this comment:
“There seems to be a double standard with who can partake in intimidation campaigns.”