Comment by blast

esprehn didn't say it isn't an interpreter. They're saying it is an interpreter and what it's interpreting isn't (all of) JS. That's also what you're saying, so you're agreeing with esprehn.

Edit: You misunderstood baobabKoodaa in the same way. Nobody is arguing about what constitutes an interpreter, except you. The question is what language is being interpreted.

Before accusing someone of pedantry, it would first be good not to completely misread them.