Comment by btdmaster
3 years ago
> As a matter of policy (as well as legality), youtube-dl does not include support for services that specialize in infringing copyright. As a rule of thumb, if you cannot easily find a video that the service is quite obviously allowed to distribute (i.e. that has been uploaded by the creator, the creator's distributor, or is published under a free license), the service is probably unfit for inclusion to youtube-dl.
Does using a different User Agent instead of a typical browser amount to copyright infringement in any jurisdiction?
Copyright law only permits making copies of artistic works when you have license to do so. Youtube only permits use of content it serves in the specific situations described in its terms of service. All other use is prohibited.
You can see the terms of service here:
https://www.youtube.com/static?gl=GB&template=terms
In particular, the first three points in the "permissions and restrictions" section explicitly prohibit tools like youtube-dl. I've pasted these below:
As a convenient figleaf, it is also possible to use youtube-dl for some purposes that are not dubious. Of the people I know who use the tool, none of them do that.
> as permitted by applicable law
YouTube's ToS does nothing to change applicable law, which was my stated question. What YouTube wants is not necessarily what the law says.
Besides, YouTube does not hold copyright on most videos, so their ToS does magically not allow them to claim copyright infringement.