Comment by quickthrower2

> AI generated content is only as successful as the content it generates.

What does success mean? Let's assume you mean "Profit from visits generated by SEO"

> If you were to read some content that's useful to you, does it matter the source?

I am doubtful about there being any intersection in a venn diagram between

* Content that is useful to me

* Successful at extracting money through SEO

* AI generated

> I get that google is increasingly being degraded by SEO content, but that's a problem with google, not this site allowing users to use AI generated content as a writing tool.

This is disingenuous. There is no way we can believe that AI generate content will be as accurate and useful as human generated content. We want the quality human generated content. Until we get to AIs that are as intelligent as human beings, and share our context.

Using AI as a tool where the human edits it is probably OK. But blasting out AI-generated articles with no review is going to be horrible. And using Google as justification - well Googles weakness is what makes this idea profitable!