Previous poster said that GPT is to writing what calculators are to math. That's an interesting point, is this an analogy we can reason with?
My terse response was "no, because calculators are correct all the time whereas GPT is incorrect a lot of time". So, that reasoning can't be used. Need a different one.
The goal of HN is not “win argument” but curious debate. You know what I meant.
What was "curious debate" about your terse and wholly incorrect quip?
For the purposes of my education and socialisation to HN.
Previous poster said that GPT is to writing what calculators are to math. That's an interesting point, is this an analogy we can reason with?
My terse response was "no, because calculators are correct all the time whereas GPT is incorrect a lot of time". So, that reasoning can't be used. Need a different one.
So we conclude, no that's not a good analogy.
3 replies →