← Back to context

Comment by ghaff

4 years ago

If getting food on a flight is a medical issue, someone should be bringing their own food.

Yeah, they should, but if someone with that severe an allergy is on the plane, would that be allowed? Also people are stupid and don't think ahead or plan for contingencies: I can see people reading there will be food service and deciding they don't need to bring their own.

It's not always only ingested food that is a safety issue. Some people have allergies that are severe enough that physical contact is enough to cause anaphylaxis. For example, there was a kid with a dairy allergy who died when other kids put a piece of cheese down his shirt[1]

[1]https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/may/02/boy-with-all...

  • If someone can't tolerate anyone else on a flight eating anything, they probably shouldn't fly.

    • Why not? If the airline has a policy that allows them to fly, why wouldn't they? It's not the people with allergies asking the flight not to serve other people peanuts, it's the airline itself deciding to do that.

      Besides if someone has a contact allergy to nuts, I can't think of a place more likely for it to happen than a plane. One patch of turbulence, and your seat neighbor's peanuts go all over you.

I did. I was told I could not eat it due to the possibility it contained nuts.

Both of these flights were TATL but on the lower end (5-7 hours) of the time range. The restriction only applied to our section of business class, which neither time was fully booked.

"If being exposed to trace amounts of [an allergen] on a flight is a medical issue, someone shouldn't be taking a plane."