← Back to context Comment by veratwiger 3 years ago As long as you agree not to shit on other people's identities, which should be a given. 3 comments veratwiger Reply JasonFruit 3 years ago > agree not to shit on other people's identitiesI believe you mean, "agree with me on gender and sexuality". When you take away the tendentious wording, it's a lot less clear that it "should be a given." TheHappyOddish 3 years ago "Peoples identities" is a relatively new concept, and certainly still a political topic. Do you really not see the political undertones? tervly 3 years ago What if it's a false identity?
JasonFruit 3 years ago > agree not to shit on other people's identitiesI believe you mean, "agree with me on gender and sexuality". When you take away the tendentious wording, it's a lot less clear that it "should be a given."
TheHappyOddish 3 years ago "Peoples identities" is a relatively new concept, and certainly still a political topic. Do you really not see the political undertones?
> agree not to shit on other people's identities
I believe you mean, "agree with me on gender and sexuality". When you take away the tendentious wording, it's a lot less clear that it "should be a given."
"Peoples identities" is a relatively new concept, and certainly still a political topic. Do you really not see the political undertones?
What if it's a false identity?