Comment by wilg
3 years ago
The charitable interpretation is "The person in the driver's seat is not interacting with the car in any way in this video".
3 years ago
The charitable interpretation is "The person in the driver's seat is not interacting with the car in any way in this video".
I don't think that's a reasonable interpretation considering the next line is: "He is not doing anything. The car is driving itself"
Why say the exact same thing twice? I think its clear Tesla wanted to make a stronger claim than "he happened to not do anything this particular time"