> That accident was caused by an inattentive driver, full stop.
No, you've been musked. It was Tesla's software that brought the car to a full stop, full stop. It's funny how Tesla wants to claim credit for X million miles without crashes under software control, except for that last mile where there's a problem. That one belongs to the driver.
> Even an FSDb equipped Tesla isn’t autonomous,
So.. you agree that Tesla's video promoting full self-driving was staged. And you agree with Tesla that they have failed to deliver full self-driving:
That accident was caused by an inattentive driver, full stop.
Even an FSDb equipped Tesla isn’t autonomous, and the car in question didn’t even have that.
> That accident was caused by an inattentive driver, full stop.
No, you've been musked. It was Tesla's software that brought the car to a full stop, full stop. It's funny how Tesla wants to claim credit for X million miles without crashes under software control, except for that last mile where there's a problem. That one belongs to the driver.
> Even an FSDb equipped Tesla isn’t autonomous,
So.. you agree that Tesla's video promoting full self-driving was staged. And you agree with Tesla that they have failed to deliver full self-driving:
https://electrek.co/2022/12/07/tesla-self-driving-claims-fai...
> the car in question didn’t even have that.
Sure it did. Your beliefs are not matching the realities. You might want to read the article. Here's another article:
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/17/business/tesla-8-car-cras...
> No, you've been musked.
Sorry internet troll, but no, I haven’t. You’re the one stupid enough to take Musk at his word, not I.
> you agree that Tesla's video promoting full self-driving was staged.
Of course I do. Any sane person would also agree.
> Sure it did.
Read it again. Then apply logical thought to it and not “yeah, here’s a link that I can parrot around like an idiot!”