← Back to context

Comment by mavili

3 years ago

So this person has been able to replicate a process that he thinks Samsung must've used, and this is proof? What a load of rubbish this article is!

Not denying that Samsung or any other brand would fake things, but this is in no way any proof at all.

I think you misread the article. What they did was:

1. Use Photoshop to blur a photo of the moon, destroying detail

2. Use a Samsung camera to take a photo of the blurred photo of the moon

3. The camera somehow emits a crisp photo of the moon, including the detail that was destroyed in step 1

It seems like the camera AI detected 'this is a photo of the moon', and used its knowledge of what the moon looks like to add the detail back in. Where else could the camera have gotten the detail from?

  • Ah yes, now I get it! I either didnt read the article clearly or you outline the steps much better than the article does! My bad.