← Back to context

Comment by jabart

3 years ago

The law has a call out that software development costs are all R&D now. So yes according to my understanding (as one of the signers) and those who have written about this as well.

When you say "as one of the signers" do you mean you signed the federal bill which modified this tax? i.e. you are a congressperson? Surely I'm misunderstanding you; your post history is utterly incompatible with any sitting congressperson. But I can't figure out what you meant by it.

  • Per the article, some 600 business owners signed a letter to congress asking for urgent relief;

    > As the House legislation is introduced, a grassroots effort is gaining momentum among software developers, with nearly 600 small business owners including Landsman and Bennett signing a letter to the Hill desks of House Way and Means Committee chair Jason Smith (R-Missouri) and Senate Finance Committee chair Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) on Tuesday morning, asking for “urgent relief” and warning that failure to bring back full R&D expensing may wipe out their companies.

    I assume that's what he signed.

I think this is flawed in both directions. Sure when you’re primarily building new stuff maybe the cost of that should be amortized. What happens if you’re just maintaining a product though rather than actually developing new stuff? That doesn’t feel like R&D effort.

  • Maintenance of existing software doesn't count as R&D under this categorization. The IRS will have some helpful guidance available in June. You know, two months after the deadline.

Yes. You could look at this as an indictment of the tax system, in that the plain language says what it says, but the IRS expects you to hire an account to make an "appropriate determination."

No small business accountant is incentivized to give you creative opinions, they're just going to go with whatever is the most popular practice. They don't give a fuck how much tax you actually pay.