Comment by Brian_K_White
3 years ago
"I'm curious why you seem to think that Tor is more legitimate to block than those behind CGNAT."
Who said that? I don't see anyone saying that.
3 years ago
"I'm curious why you seem to think that Tor is more legitimate to block than those behind CGNAT."
Who said that? I don't see anyone saying that.
How else would you interpret "I see them using some VPNs and using Tor, but that makes sense, because that's super close to the type of traffic that these filters were designed to block"? They seem to be implying that Tor is a form of acceptable collateral damage, but the likely problem here, i.e. the CGNAT instantiation of collateral blocking, is not.
That only says why it might be blocked, not that it's right.
I never said they claimed it was right, just that it was more acceptable. Again, I don't see how one could interpret it otherwise?
3 replies →