Comment by tga_d
3 years ago
How else would you interpret "I see them using some VPNs and using Tor, but that makes sense, because that's super close to the type of traffic that these filters were designed to block"? They seem to be implying that Tor is a form of acceptable collateral damage, but the likely problem here, i.e. the CGNAT instantiation of collateral blocking, is not.
That only says why it might be blocked, not that it's right.
I never said they claimed it was right, just that it was more acceptable. Again, I don't see how one could interpret it otherwise?
They didn't suggest it was acceptable or more acceptable either, or any other equivalent words for ok, or agreeable, or understandable, or justified, or proper, or reasonable, or...
2 replies →