Comment by hammyhavoc
3 years ago
Because a research paper claimed that they believe it's a basic and incomplete AGI. However, said paper then goes on to actually say LLMs aren't the way forward if people bother to read it.
One comment on HN called it a "baby AGI" after linking to the paper.
Eye roll inducing.
Yeah but LLMs could be a small component of future AGI. You can’t deny that models that fool so many people into thinking the models really reason are a step towards AGI.