Comment by haldujai
2 years ago
Since you mentioned nebulous, this is the Oxford definition:
> verb: bullshit; 3rd person present: bullshits; past tense: bullshitted; past participle: bullshitted; gerund or present participle: bullshitting
> talk nonsense to (someone), typically to be misleading or deceptive.
It’s reasonable to interpret debullshitification as removing bias (i.e. what is misleading or deceptive in the news article) in this context rather than the “fluff” listed.
As I stated in the comment you replied to, GP has a different definition and I agreed removing fluff definitely has value.
It's reasonable to interpret debullshitification as "removing bullshit." Specifically, "the reverse process of bullshitification."
Speaking nonsense, misleading, and deceiving aren't the same as "adding bias." They're just techniques that can be used to do so.