Comment by bombcar
3 years ago
The world of tape backup was (is?) absolutely filled with all sorts of vendor-lock in projects and tools. It's a complete mess.
And even various versions of tar aren't compatible, and that's not even starting with star and friends.
It's not just limited to tape, most archiving and backup software is proprietary. It's impossible to open Acronis or Macrium Reflect images without their Windows software. In Acronis's case they even make it impossible to use offline or on a server OS without paying for a license. NTBackup is awfully slow and doesn't work past Vista, and it's not even part of XP POSReady for whatever reason, so I had to rip the exe from a XP ISO and unpack it (NTBACKUP._EX... I forgot microsoft's term for that) because the Vista version available on Microsoft's site specifically checks for longhorn or vista.
Then there's slightly more obscure formats that didn't take off in the western world, and the physical mediums too. Not many people had the pleasure of having to extract hundreds of "GCA" files off of MO disks using obscure Japanese freeware from 2002. The English version of the software even has a bunch of flags on virustotal that the standard one doesn't. And there's obscure LZH compression algorithms that no tool available now can handle.
I've found myself setting up one-time Windows 2000/XP VMs just to access backups made after 2000.
I can only speak for macrium but they have good reasons to use their own format, so that you can have differential mountable backups. That's very different from someone inventing tar-but-worse.
I have at various times considered a tape backup solution for my home, but always give up when it seems every tape vendor is only interested in business clients. It was a race to stay ahead of hard drives and oftentimes they seemed to be losing. The price points were clearly aimed at business customers, especially on the larger capacity tapes. In the end I do backup to hard drives instead because it's much cheaper and faster.
Tape absolutely isn't viable for the consumer at all, but definitely worth exploring for the novelty. Even if you manage to get a pretty good deal on a legacy LTO system (other formats don't even come close to the tb/$ of 10+ year old LTO and drives are still fairly cheap), the drives aren't being made any more and aren't getting any cheaper. Backwards compatibilty may be in your favor depending on your choice of tape generation at least, I think there's at least two generations guaranteed. Optical will probably remain king though the pricing is worse than HDDs, there's no shortage of DVD or BD readers, but you might run into issues with quad layer 128 BD as they only hit the market fairly recently.
The only reasonable solution is to keep migrating and checking the data on various media; but this is expensive and often deemed not worth it.
2 replies →
Tape drive and Bareos/Bacula "just works"
Absolutely not worth it tho. Drives are hideously expensive which means they only start making sense where you have at least dozens of tapes.
There is an advantage of tapes not being electrically connected most of the time so lightning strike will not burn your archives, I have pondered making a separate box with a bunch of hard drives that boots once a month and just copies last months of backups on hard drives, powered from solar or something just to separate from the network
The only way to do tape at home is with used equipment and Linux/BSD. You can do quite a bit with tar and mt (iirc) - even controlling auto loaders.
What’s fun are the hard drive based systems designed to perfectly imitate a tape autoloader so you don’t have to buy new backup software (virtual tape libraries).