← Back to context

Comment by anothernewdude

3 years ago

We are living in a base reality by definition.

BARRET: Have y'all ever considered that none of this is real? That we're just part of some game, a simulation?

TIFA: Barret, what are you talking about?

AERITH: It's an interesting thought, though. Sometimes, everything does seem too surreal to be true.

BARRET: Exactly! Maybe we're just codes in a computer, or pawns in someone else's game.

CLOUD: Barret, that's ridiculous. Even if it were true, how would that change anything?

CLOUD: We are living in a base reality by definition.

TIFA: Cloud's right. Whether it's a simulation or not, this is our reality. We have to deal with it.

AERITH: Maybe the real question should be, what can we do to make this reality better?

BARRET: Hmph, you're all just too afraid to face the truth. But mark my words, one day you'll see.

No, we are not? I am confused what definition you are using. If the Matrix were real, you would say the Matrix is base reality?

  • I think his point is that even if we're technically in a simulation, we very likely do not have access to any exterior world.

    Thus, in some sense, this is base reality "by definition" - that reality beyond which you cannot find anything else.

    I don't agree, but it's a reasonable way to think about it (if that is in fact what OP meant).

    • We do though. It's pretty easy to have an out of body experience within about twenty days of trying. NDE phenomena has just too much data to dismiss if you give it a fair consideration. We get glimpses that there's more when you dig into the latest from Nima Arkani-Hamed. Donald Hoffman is a bit more of a stretch but his assertion that there's no way we can percieve true reality is solid.

      7 replies →