Comment by oezi
3 years ago
It is funny that you say so because for me the primary axis was about whether the rule was violated or not.
This is why some people (including myself) chose that an ambulance driven into a park wouldn't be a violation of the rule.
But it is a violation. I guess from my perspective it was a justified violation of the rule, but it was still a violation
Depends on the meaning of rule and violation I guess. I interpreted it as a sign posted at the entrance of the park. I interpreted violation as something that would be stopped by the park rangers.
Their point is that "was the rule violated" is a combination of "is a vehicle" and "in the park", hence both axes are relevant factors. If pushed, I would concede that the ISS is a vehicle, but I would consider the bounds of the park to end far lower than where the ISS orbits, so despite being "a vehicle" it doesn't violate the rule because I don't consider it "in the park". "Is it in the park" isn't relevant for most of the questions, but it's still an important part of the premise.